From undertaking stimulation to collision, tumble and restructure, this chain effect certainly is considered as a part of the creative process. Imagine the chaos between two artists disputing the annotation rights for the ‘exhibition title’ in order to give out the best mutual concept to the viewers. By exchanging the projects to one and another, the potential notions including ‘Does the inspiration really exist?’ ‘How an artist performs their tasks?’ ‘Is it important for artists to stylize themselves throughout the process of creating? Are there any limitations?’ ‘What do we care other than arts?’...etc.
Streaming through confrontations to countless argumentations, and turned out with different motions and opinions, the exhibition was named as “New Work Project.”
In the exhibition of “New Work Project,” two artists need to select three former artworks from the other for remodification. After a long discussion and communication in behalf of comprehending the opposite party, every piecemeal went through the faith of either withhold or discard, and then transformed into a ‘New/Old Work.’ The precondition of one ‘project’ is to give the exhibition instruction to penetrate the meaning of the work until it exalted itself. In hence, the viewers will notice 12 workpieces with only 6 titles when they come to the exhibition. These were ‘anew’ creations with different materials and techniques from past time. Perhaps, there might be a deeper message within the works, which carry out by another artist, unfold in front of the viewers? Or is it possible that two artworks could truly become the same piece while the creative concept and subject are coherent to each other?